BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017 420ivsBMW E9 3.0CS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW E9
3.0CS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range968 km601 mi
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW E9 3.0CS
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | BMWE93.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 95.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.8s Calculated | 51.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 968km601mi Calculated | 643km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,985cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,640mm183in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,670mm66in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,446mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,589mm63in | 1,402mm55in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i: Power / Torque
- BMW E9 3.0CS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 5,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BMWE93.0CS | 6,000 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | BMWE93.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.8 s | 51.5 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMWE93.0CS | 180 hp 134 kW |
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i has 4 hp more than BMW E9 3.0CS.
The biggest power difference is between BMW E9 3.0CS and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| BMWE93.0CS | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| BMWE93.0CS | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWE93.0CS | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 7.8 s |
| BMWE93.0CS | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i and BMW E9 3.0CS: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CS | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i and BMW E9 3.0CS: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| BMWE93.0CS | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 968 km 601 mi |
| BMWE93.0CS | 643 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWE93.0CS | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.2 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWE93.0CS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWE93.0CS |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| BMWE93.0CS | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CS | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i | BMWE93.0CS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 968 km 601 mi | 643 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i | BMW E9 3.0CS |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 325 km (202 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW E9 3.0CS
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























