Caterham CSR
Car comparison
Caterham CSR CSRvsBMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) · Facelift 2007 635d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) · Facelift 2007
635d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Caterham CSR CSR
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest515 kg1,135 lb
- Best power-to-weight505 hp/t376 kW/t2.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score71/100
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Best overall score60/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CaterhamCSRCSR | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 271Nm200lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 515kg1,135lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 33.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 97.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 505hp/t376kW/t229hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 972km604mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,261cc138cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 3,300mm130in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,505mm59in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | - | 1,374mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,315mm91in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,465mm58in | 1,596mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Caterham CSR CSR: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 7,500 rpm | - | 7,750 rpm |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CaterhamCSRCSR | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 260 hp 194 kW |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d has 26 hp more than Caterham CSR CSR.
The biggest power difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 515 kg 1,135 lb |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 3.0 s |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | 6.6 s |
Although BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d has more power, Caterham CSR CSR is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d: 3.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 260 hp 194 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CaterhamCSRCSR | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007635d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 515 kg 1,135 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 972 km 604 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Caterham CSR CSR
- Is 1,345 kg lighter
- Is 3.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 351 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) Facelift 2007 635d
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 309 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























