BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520dvsVolga C50 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolga C50
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volga C50 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | VolgaC502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 325Nm240lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,043kg4,504lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 60.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 681km423mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,060mm199in | 4,825mm190in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,469mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,634mm64in | 1,618mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 154mm6in | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 49L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d: Power / Torque
- Volga C50 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolgaC502.0T | 4,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | VolgaC502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 197 hp 147 kW |
| VolgaC502.0T | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volga C50 2.0T has 3 hp more than BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d and Volga C50 2.0T: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolgaC502.0T | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
| VolgaC502.0T | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolgaC502.0T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 7.3 s |
| VolgaC502.0T | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volga C50 2.0T and BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolgaC502.0T | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d and Volga C50 2.0T: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolgaC502.0T | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolgaC502.0T | 681 km 423 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 197 hp 147 kW | 7.3 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolgaC502.0T | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolgaC502.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolgaC502.0T |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolgaC502.0T | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolgaC502.0T | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)520d | VolgaC502.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 681 km 423 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d | Volga C50 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 520d
- Has 75 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 319 km (198 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volga C50 2.0T
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























