BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) · Facelift 2022 320dvsVolga C50 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolga C50
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score91/100
Volga C50 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | VolgaC502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 325Nm240lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,043kg4,504lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 60.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,017km632mi Calculated | 681km423mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,713mm186in | 4,825mm190in |
| Width | 1,827mm72in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,469mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,567mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 49L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d: Power / Torque
- Volga C50 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolgaC502.0T | 4,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | VolgaC502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolgaC502.0T | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volga C50 2.0T has 10 hp more than BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d and Volga C50 2.0T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolgaC502.0T | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
| VolgaC502.0T | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolgaC502.0T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 7.2 s |
| VolgaC502.0T | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volga C50 2.0T and BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolgaC502.0T | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d and Volga C50 2.0T: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolgaC502.0T | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 1,017 km 632 mi |
| VolgaC502.0T | 681 km 423 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolgaC502.0T | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolgaC502.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolgaC502.0T |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolgaC502.0T | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolgaC502.0T | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d | VolgaC502.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,017 km 632 mi | 681 km 423 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d | Volga C50 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI) Facelift 2022 320d
- Has 75 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 337 km (209 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volga C50 2.0T
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























