BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328ivsFord Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus II
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score84/100
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
- Most powerful223 hp166 kW
- Highest torque292 Nm215 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk507 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 223hp166kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 292Nm215lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 33.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 765km475mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,793cc170cu in | 3,191cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,877mm192in |
| Width | 1,698mm67in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,393mm55in | 1,374mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,408mm55in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,421mm56in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 507L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 5,500 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 33.4 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 223 hp 166 kW |
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 has 30 hp more than BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 292 Nm 215 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 7.3 s |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 8.4 s |
Although Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 has more power, BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 223 hp 166 kW | 8.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 223 hp 166 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 292 Nm 215 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 765 km 475 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 507 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 12 Nm more
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























