BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003 330CdvsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 200 SX (S14)
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range818 km508 mi
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 86.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,488mm177in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,757mm69in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,369mm54in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 307L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: Power / Torque
- Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd has 4 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.4 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 818 km 508 mi |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 739 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd | Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 145 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 80 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Has 103 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























