BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003 330CdvsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 i GT- R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 181Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | - |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 95.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 955km593mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,488mm177in | 4,328mm170in |
| Width | 1,757mm69in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,369mm54in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 365L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7,600 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 7,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW |
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd has 22 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.2 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd and Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.2 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 955 km 593 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 229 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Is 350 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























