BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328ivsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 200 SX (S14)
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.1s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,793cc170cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,710mm67in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,366mm54in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,408mm55in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,421mm56in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 307L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328i: Power / Torque
- Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 5,300 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.1 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo has 7 hp more than BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328i and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 7.3 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 7.5 s |
Although Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo has more power, BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328i and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E36) 328i
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 98 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























