BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223ivsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Galaxy III
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk415 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,704kg3,757lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.8s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 53.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 634km394mi Calculated | 1,273km791mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,386mm173in | 4,848mm191in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,576mm62in | 1,747mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,584mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 171mm7in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 415L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,405L | 2,339L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i: Power / Torque
- Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 53.1 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 204 hp 152 kW |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 6 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 6.9 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 8.9 s |
Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 2.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 634 km 394 mi |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 634 km 394 mi | 1,273 km 791 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i
- Is 89 kg lighter
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 639 km (397 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























