Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220dvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)

220d

150 hp1995 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2024-present
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Largest trunk
    432 L

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
150hp112kW
170hp127kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,565kg3,450lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
91.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
87.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
42.3s
Calculated
50.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,102km685mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,386mm173in
4,379mm172in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,576mm62in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,588mm63in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
171mm7in
-
Trunk volume
415L
432L
Max trunk volume
1,405L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
54L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220dFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d3,750-4,000 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi3,500 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
42.3 s
50.3 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
150 hp
112 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi has 20 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
1,565 kg
3,450 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
220 km/h
137 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d8.3 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s

Although Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
1,102 km
685 mi
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
150 hp
112 kW
8.3 s
220 km/h
137 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,576 mm
62.0 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.3 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
150 hp
112 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,565 kg
3,450 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,576 mm
62.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
1,102 km
685 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
Trunk score
415 L
14.7 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220dFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 121 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 17 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

220d
218d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
220d
218d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
220d
218d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dvsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
220d
218d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dvsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)218d
2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
220d
218i
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dvsBMW2 Series Coupe (G42)218i
2.0 TDCi
1.8 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
220d
218d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220dvsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster