Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220ivsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)

220i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2014-2018
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    134 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    468 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
192hp143kW
210hp157kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
1,960kg4,321lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
32.7s
Calculated
53.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
879km546mi
Calculated
1,273km791mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,342mm171in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,555mm61in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
468L
300L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
70L
CO2 emissions
134g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220iFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i5,000 rpm1,250 rpm5,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.7 s
53.1 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
192 hp
143 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 18 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
228 km/h
142 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i7.4 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
879 km
546 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
228 km/h
142 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,342 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,555 mm
61.2 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.4 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
192 hp
143 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.9 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,342 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,555 mm
61.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
879 km
546 mi
1,273 km
791 mi
CO2 score
134 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
468 L
16.5 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220iFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i

  • Is 274 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 168 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 170 Nm more
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 393 km (244 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

220i
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220ivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
220i
223i
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220ivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
220i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220ivsBMW2 Series Convertible (F23)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
220i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220ivsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)220d
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
220i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220ivsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
220i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220ivsBMW2 Series Coupe (G42)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220i vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster