Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCivsBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)

218d

150 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    214 km/h
    133 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d

  • Lightest
    1,410 kg
    3,109 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    114 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    468 L
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCiBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
Power
210hp157kW
150hp112kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,704kg3,757lb
1,410kg3,109lb
Gross weight
2,620kg5,776lb
1,955kg4,310lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.9s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
53.1s
Calculated
54.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,273km791mi
Calculated
1,186km737mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,848mm191in
4,342mm171in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,747mm69in
1,555mm61in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,561mm61in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,562mm61in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
165mm6in
Trunk volume
300L
468L
Max trunk volume
2,339L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
51L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218dPowerTorque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
  • BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d4,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCiBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.9 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
53.1 s
54.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 60 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
1,410 kg
3,109 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d8.9 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
1,186 km
737 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
150 hp
112 kW
8.9 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,342 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,555 mm
61.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCiBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
Power
210 hp
157 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.9 s
8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
1,410 kg
3,109 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,342 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,555 mm
61.2 in
Range score
1,273 km
791 mi
1,186 km
737 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
114 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km7.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi12.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal645 L170 US gal142 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,129 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d

  • Is 294 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 168 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 30 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d - car comparison - FastVsFaster