Ford Galaxy III
Car comparison
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCivsBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
218d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Largest trunk468 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,704kg3,757lb | 1,410kg3,109lb |
| Gross weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | 1,955kg4,310lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.1s Calculated | 54.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,273km791mi Calculated | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,848mm191in | 4,342mm171in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,747mm69in | 1,555mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 468L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,339L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.1 s | 54.4 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 60 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 8.9 s |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 8.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 1,186 km 737 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,273 km 791 mi | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Is 294 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 168 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























