Bentley Flying Spur III
Car comparison
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12vsNIO ET9 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNIO ET9
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed333 km/h207 mph
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lightest2,437 kg5,373 lb
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score71/100
NIO ET9 100 kWh
- Most powerful707 hp527 kW
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk544 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | NIOET9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 707hp527kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,437kg5,373lb | 2,700kg5,952lb |
| Gross weight | 3,000kg6,614lb | 3,100kg6,834lb |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.4s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph Calculated | 36.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 261hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km420mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | - |
| Length | 5,316mm209in | 5,325mm210in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 2,017mm79in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,621mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,194mm126in | 3,250mm128in |
| Front track | - | 1,731mm68in |
| Rear track | - | 1,758mm69in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 544L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | NIOET9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 14.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 37.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 217 km/h 135 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 707 hp 527 kW |
NIO ET9 100 kWh has 72 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 and NIO ET9 100 kWh: 72 hp (54 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 2,437 kg 5,373 lb |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 2,700 kg 5,952 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| NIOET9100 kWh | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 3.8 s |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 4.3 s |
Although NIO ET9 100 kWh has more power, Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 and NIO ET9 100 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 261 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 707 hp 527 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NIOET9100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | NIOET9100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 707 hp 527 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,437 kg 5,373 lb | 2,700 kg 5,952 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 420 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 544 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 261 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,491 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 263 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 98 km/h (61 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
NIO ET9 100 kWh
- Has 72 hp more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 124 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























