Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12vsBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur III

6.0 W12

635 hp5950 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2019-2024
VS

Bentley Mulsanne EWB

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    333 km/h
    207 mph
  • Most powerful
    635 hp
    474 kW
  • Lightest
    2,437 kg
    5,373 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    261 hp/t
    194 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    13.3 L/100 km
    17.7 mpg US
    21.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.6 L/100 km
    12.6 mpg US
    15.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    677 km
    420 mi
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    71/100

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    446 L
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
635hp474kW
512hp382kW
Torque
900Nm664lb-ft
1,020Nm752lb-ft
Curb weight
2,437kg5,373lb
2,730kg6,019lb
Gross weight
3,000kg6,614lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
To 99% top speed
50.4s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph
Calculated
70.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
9.9s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
261hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb
Calculated
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton
Calculated
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
677km420mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,950cc363cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,316mm209in
5,825mm229in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,541mm61in
Wheelbase
3,194mm126in
3,516mm138in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
420L
446L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
96L
CO2 emissions-
344g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W125,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.9 s
15.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
37.0 s
-
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
217 km/h
135 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
635 hp
474 kW
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 has 123 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12: 123 hp (92 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
2,437 kg
5,373 lb
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
2,730 kg
6,019 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
333 km/h
207 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W123.8 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 1.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
261 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
677 km
420 mi
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
635 hp
474 kW
3.8 s
333 km/h
207 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.5 s
296 km/h
184 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
3.8 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
261 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
635 hp
474 kW
512 hp
382 kW
Torque
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
5.5 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Lightness
2,437 kg
5,373 lb
2,730 kg
6,019 lb
Fuel consumption
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in
Range score
677 km
420 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
-
344 g/km
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
261 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.28 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.46 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,491 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12

  • Has 123 hp more
  • Is 293 kg lighter
  • Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 37 km/h (23 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 73 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 26 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 W12
S 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
6.0 W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
6.0 W12
AMG E 63 S
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
6.0 W12
CS 4.4 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
6.0 W12
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.0 W12
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)Facelift 2016Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
6.75 V8
F 5.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
6.0 W12
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 vs Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster