Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12vsBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II

6.0 W12

616 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2015
VS

Bentley Mulsanne EWB

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    330 km/h
    205 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    616 hp
    459 kW
  • Lightest
    2,475 kg
    5,456 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    249 hp/t
    186 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    22.4 L/100 km
    10.5 mpg US
    12.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    343 g/km
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.6 L/100 km
    16.1 mpg US
    19.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    658 km
    409 mi
  • Best economy score
    68/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
616hp459kW
512hp382kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
1,020Nm752lb-ft
Curb weight
2,475kg5,456lb
2,730kg6,019lb
Gross weight
2,972kg6,552lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
296 km/h
184 mph
To 99% top speed
61.6s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
70.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
12.1s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton
Calculated
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
612km380mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,295mm208in
5,825mm229in
Width
1,976mm78in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,488mm59in
1,541mm61in
Wheelbase
3,065mm121in
3,516mm138in
Front track
1,643mm65in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,642mm65in
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume-
446L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
96L
CO2 emissions
343g/km
344g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W126,000 rpm2,000 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.1 s
15.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
49.3 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Likely limited
296 km/h
184 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
202 km/h
126 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
616 hp
459 kW
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW

Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 has 104 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12: 104 hp (78 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
2,730 kg
6,019 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W124.6 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
612 km
380 mi
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
616 hp
459 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.5 s
296 km/h
184 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
Power
616 hp
459 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,295 mm
208.5 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
Power
616 hp
459 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
4.6 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
616 hp
459 kW
512 hp
382 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Lightness
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
2,730 kg
6,019 lb
Fuel consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,295 mm
208.5 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in
Range score
612 km
380 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
343 g/km
344 g/km
Trunk score
-
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Consumption14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.72 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.40 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,859 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12

  • Has 104 hp more
  • Is 255 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
6.0 W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
6.0 W12
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
6.0 W12
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.0 W12
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
6.75 V8
F 5.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
6.0 W12
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
6.75 V8
S 560 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (X222)Facelift 2017S 560 V8
Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 vs Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster