Mercedes-Benz CL (C215)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12vsBentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,880 kg4,145 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption19.9 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best performance score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 100.5s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 27.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 657km408mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,786cc353cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,993mm197in | 5,240mm206in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,398mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,885mm114in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,577mm62in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 347L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 5,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 4,150 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 27.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 has 41 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 6.1 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 6.4 s |
Although Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 657 km 408 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12
- Is 730 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 103 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 270 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























