Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C215)
CL 600 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score75/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best estimated range657 km408 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 85.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 21.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 195hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km329mi Calculated | 657km408mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,786cc353cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 4,993mm197in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,488mm59in | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 5,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 21.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 367 hp 274 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12 has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 6.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 657 km 408 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 |
| 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)CL 600 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 329 mi | 657 km 408 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Is 335 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) CL 600 V12
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























