Car comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0vsBentley Continental R 6.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

V8 4.0

507 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2018
VS

Bentley Continental R

6.7 i V8

408 hp6750 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe1994-2007

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    305 km/h
    190 mph
  • Most powerful
    507 hp
    378 kW
  • Lightest
    2,295 kg
    5,060 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    221 hp/t
    165 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.5 L/100 km
    15.2 mpg US
    18.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    358 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
Power
507hp378kW
408hp304kW
Torque
660Nm487lb-ft
800Nm590lb-ft
Curb weight
2,295kg5,060lb
2,610kg5,754lb
Gross weight
2,750kg6,063lb
2,980kg6,570lb
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
249 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
88.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
99.7s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
15.5s
Calculated
27.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK
28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
849km528mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,993cc244cu in
6,750cc412cu in
Length
4,806mm189in
5,240mm206in
Width
1,944mm77in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,404mm55in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,550mm61in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,580mm62in
Trunk volume
358L
347L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
108L
CO2 emissions
246g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V84,150 rpm2,150 rpm4,400 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.5 s
27.1 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
249 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
507 hp
378 kW
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
408 hp
304 kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has 99 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 99 hp (74 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
2,610 kg
5,754 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
305 km/h
190 mph
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
249 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: 1.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
507 hp
378 kW
4.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
408 hp
304 kW
6.4 s
249 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
408 hp
304 kW
Torque
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
6.4 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
249 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
2,610 kg
5,754 lb
Fuel consumption
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
849 km
528 mi
-
CO2 score
246 g/km
-
Trunk score
358 L
12.6 cu ft
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
Consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0

  • Has 99 hp more
  • Is 315 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 56 km/h (35 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 11 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 vs Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster