Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0vsBentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk358 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score78/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 99.7s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 849km528mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,240mm206in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | 347L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 246g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 4,150 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has 99 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 99 hp (74 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 849 km 528 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 246 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Has 99 hp more
- Is 315 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 56 km/h (35 mph) higher top speed
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Has 140 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























