Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8vsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
V8 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight310 hp/t231 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score81/100
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range849 km528 mi
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.4s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 89.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 310hp/t231kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 849km528mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,546mm179in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,288mm51in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 98mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 358L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 246g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,750 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 128 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 has 3 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 677 km 421 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 849 km 528 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 849 km 528 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 246 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 650 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 89 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























