Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0vsBentley Continental R 6.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Best power-to-weight205 hp/t153 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range826 km513 mi
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score78/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
- Lightest2,450 kg5,401 lb
- Largest trunk347 L
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 835Nm616lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.3s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 91.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 826km513mi Calculated | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,872mm74in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 347L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 254g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has 101 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 101 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 5.0 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 7.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 826 km 513 mi |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 578 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.0 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
| 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 826 km 513 mi | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 254 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 | Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 32.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 52.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 2,805 L741 US gal617 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 4,909 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Has 101 hp more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 56 km/h (35 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 7.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 248 km (154 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Has 175 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























