Bentley Continental GT
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurbovsBentley Continental R 6.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Lightest2,385 kg5,258 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
- Best estimated range578 km359 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 835Nm616lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,800kg6,173lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.9s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 91.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 526km327mi Calculated | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,807mm189in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,872mm74in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 347L |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo has 154 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 154 hp (115 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 526 km 327 mi |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 578 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.8 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
| 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
| 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 526 km 327 mi | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km | 32.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi | 52.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal | 2,805 L741 US gal617 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year | 4,909 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Has 154 hp more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 73 km/h (45 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Has 185 Nm more
- Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























