Car comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0vsMaserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015

V8 4.0

507 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCabriolet / convertible2015-2018
VS

Maserati GranCabrio I

MC 4.7 V8

460 hp4691 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0

  • Fastest top speed
    301 km/h
    187 mph
  • Most powerful
    507 hp
    378 kW
  • Highest torque
    660 Nm
    487 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.9 L/100 km
    14.8 mpg US
    17.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    254 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    826 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    260 L
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    44/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
Power
507hp378kW
460hp343kW
Torque
660Nm487lb-ft
520Nm384lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
1,973kg4,350lb
Gross weight
2,900kg6,393lb
-
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
To 99% top speed
95.3s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
76.7s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
16.7s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
826km513mi
Calculated
517km321mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,993cc244cu in
4,691cc286cu in
Length
4,806mm189in
4,933mm194in
Width
1,944mm77in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,403mm55in
1,343mm53in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,942mm116in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,590mm63in
Trunk volume
260L
173L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
75L
CO2 emissions
254g/km
337g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
  • Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V87,000 rpm4,750 rpm7,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.7 s
15.9 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
111 mph
181 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
507 hp
378 kW
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
460 hp
343 kW

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has 47 hp more than Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 47 hp (35 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
520 Nm
384 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
1,973 kg
4,350 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
301 km/h
187 mph
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
289 km/h
180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has more power, Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
826 km
513 mi
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
517 km
321 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
507 hp
378 kW
5.0 s
301 km/h
187 mph
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
460 hp
343 kW
4.9 s
289 km/h
180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
173 L
6.1 cu ft
Length
4,933 mm
194.2 in
Height
1,343 mm
52.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.0 s
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0MaseratiGranCabrio IMC 4.7 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
460 hp
343 kW
Torque
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
4.9 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
1,973 kg
4,350 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
173 L
6.1 cu ft
Length
4,933 mm
194.2 in
Height
1,343 mm
52.9 in
Range score
826 km
513 mi
517 km
321 mi
CO2 score
254 g/km
337 g/km
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
173 L
6.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km25.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi40.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,806 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0

  • Has 47 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 308 km (192 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 87 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 83 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8

  • Is 497 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0
Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 vs Maserati GranCabrio I MC 4.7 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster