Bentley Continental GTC II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12vsRolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Dawn
6.6 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Lightest2,495 kg5,501 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque820 Nm605 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.1 L/100 km10.6 mpg US12.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions330 g/km
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 567hp423kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 820Nm605lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,560kg5,644lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | - |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.6s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 19.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK | 22.1L/100 km10.6mpg US12.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,592cc402cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,285mm208in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,502mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 3,112mm123in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 321L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 347g/km | 330g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 19.2 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has 4 hp more than Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 4.7 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5.0 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has more power, Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.7 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 567 hp 423 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 347 g/km | 330 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 | Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 54 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























