Car comparison

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0vsBentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg Gemera

2.0

600 hpHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turbo2020-present
VS

Bentley Continental GT III

6.0 TSI W12

635 hp5950 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Lightest
    1,850 kg
    4,079 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    324 hp/t
    242 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggGemera2.0BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
600hp447kW
635hp474kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
900Nm664lb-ft
Curb weight
1,850kg4,079lb
2,244kg4,947lb
Gross weight-
2,725kg6,008lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
333 km/h
207 mph
To 99% top speed
36.4s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
67.8s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
4.8s
Calculated
10.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.5s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
324hp/t242kW/t147hp/1000 lb
Calculated
283hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
744km462mi
Calculated
Displacement-
5,950cc363cu in
Length
4,975mm196in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,988mm78in
1,954mm77in
Height
1,295mm51in
1,405mm55in
Wheelbase
3,000mm118in
2,851mm112in
Front track-
1,672mm66in
Rear track-
1,664mm66in
Ground clearance
117mm5in
-
Trunk volume
200L
358L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
75L
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12PowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggGemera2.07,500 rpm2,000-7,000 rpm8,500 rpm
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W126,000 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggGemera2.0BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.8 s
10.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
12.1 s
48.0 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
333 km/h
207 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.2 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.5 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
277 km/h
172 mph
206 km/h
128 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 hp
447 kW
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
635 hp
474 kW

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 has 35 hp more than Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 and Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
900 Nm
664 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
1,850 kg
4,079 lb
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
2,244 kg
4,947 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
400 km/h
249 mph
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
333 km/h
207 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.01.9 s
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W123.7 s

Although Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 has more power, Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 and Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: 1.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
324 hp/t
242 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 hp
447 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
635 hp
474 kW
3.7 s
333 km/h
207 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggGemera2.0
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggGemera2.0BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
600 hp
447 kW
635 hp
474 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
3.7 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
333 km/h
207 mph
Lightness
1,850 kg
4,079 lb
2,244 kg
4,947 lb
Fuel consumption
-
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Range score
-
744 km
462 mi
Trunk score
200 L
7.1 cu ft
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
324 hp/t
242 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
Consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.18 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,176 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0

  • Is 394 kg lighter
  • Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 67 km/h (42 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
3.8 V6
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
6.0 TSI W12
Speed 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12vsBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Speed 6.0 W12
2.0
4.4 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsBMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
6.0 TSI W12
Speed 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12vsBentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12
2.0
6.0 V12
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsAston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12
6.0 TSI W12
6.0 TSI W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12vsBentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12
2.0
3.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsMcLaren600LT Spider3.8 V8
6.0 TSI W12
Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
VS
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12vsBentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
2.0
AMG SL 63 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
6.0 TSI W12
Speed 6.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Speed 6.0
2.0
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
6.0 TSI W12
Speed 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12vsBentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 vs Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster