Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0vsBentley Continental R 6.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range849 km528 mi
- Largest trunk358 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score78/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 835Nm616lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 91.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 849km528mi Calculated | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,872mm74in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | 347L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 246g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has 101 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 101 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 8.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 849 km 528 mi |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 578 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
| 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 849 km 528 mi | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 246 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 | Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 32.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 52.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 2,805 L741 US gal617 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 4,909 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Has 101 hp more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 8.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 272 km (169 mi) more estimated range
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Has 175 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























