Ford GT
Car comparison
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32VvsBentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT
6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Highest torque678 Nm500 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight346 hp/t258 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score92/100
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 557hp415kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 678Nm500lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 2,385kg5,258lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,800kg6,173lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 346hp/t258kW/t157hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 526km327mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,409cc330cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,645mm183in | 4,807mm189in |
| Width | 1,955mm77in | 1,918mm76in |
| Height | 1,125mm44in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,745mm108in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,620mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 46L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 6,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 15.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 41.8 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 216 km/h 134 mph | 184 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 557 hp 415 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW |
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo has 3 hp more than Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 318 km/h 198 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 3.6 s |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 4.8 s |
Although Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo has more power, Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 346 hp/t 258 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 557 hp 415 kW | 3.6 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.8 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 557 hp 415 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 526 km 327 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 46 L 1.6 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 346 hp/t 258 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 775 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 111 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 324 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























