Car comparison

Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurbovsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GT

6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

560 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2010
VS

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

GT3-R 4.0

580 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Most powerful
    580 hp
    433 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,195 kg
    4,839 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    264 hp/t
    197 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.7 L/100 km
    18.5 mpg US
    22.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    709 km
    440 mi
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin TurboBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
560hp418kW
580hp433kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,385kg5,258lb
2,195kg4,839lb
Gross weight
2,800kg6,173lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
To 99% top speed
91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph
Calculated
63.1s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
15.0s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
526km327mi
Calculated
709km440mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
4,807mm189in
4,806mm189in
Width
1,918mm76in
1,944mm77in
Height
1,390mm55in
1,404mm55in
Wheelbase
2,745mm108in
2,746mm108in
Front track
1,630mm64in
1,664mm66in
Rear track
1,615mm64in
1,655mm65in
Trunk volume-
358L
Max trunk volume
370L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
90L
CO2 emissions-
295g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurboBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo6,100 rpm1,650 rpm6,350 rpm
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin TurboBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
11.7 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
115 mph
200 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 has 20 hp more than Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
2,385 kg
5,258 lb
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
2,195 kg
4,839 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
318 km/h
198 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
304 km/h
189 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
560 hp
418 kW
4.8 s
318 km/h
198 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
580 hp
433 kW
3.7 s
304 km/h
189 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,807 mm
189.3 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
4.8 s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin TurboBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
560 hp
418 kW
580 hp
433 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
3.7 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
Lightness
2,385 kg
5,258 lb
2,195 kg
4,839 lb
Fuel consumption
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,807 mm
189.3 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Range score
526 km
327 mi
709 km
440 mi
CO2 score
-
295 g/km
Trunk score
370 L
13.1 cu ft
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurboBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
Consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.93 LC100 km22.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi48.16 LC100 mi35.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,489 LC/year3,334 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 12 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 190 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Bentley Continental GT II GT3-R 4.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo vs Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster