Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12vsPorsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
Turbo 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
- Lightest2,175 kg4,795 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t189 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions272 g/km
- Best estimated range756 km470 mi
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful608 hp453 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Best performance score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 770Nm568lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,175kg4,795lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,935kg6,471lb |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.0s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 57.2s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 756km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,926mm194in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,693mm67in | - |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,680L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 296g/km | 272g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 5,750-6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 has 58 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 58 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 4.1 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 649 km 403 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 756 km 470 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW | 4.1 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 756 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 296 g/km | 272 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 | Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 58 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 km (67 mi) more estimated range
- Has 261 L more trunk volume
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























