Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8vsPorsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
S 2.9 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions210 g/km
- Best estimated range1,076 km669 mi
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score86/100
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Lightest2,020 kg4,453 lb
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk770 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 435hp324kW | 440hp328kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,544kg5,609lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,840kg6,261lb |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.6s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 17.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,076km669mi Calculated | 798km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,894cc177cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,918mm194in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,722mm68in | 1,696mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,895mm114in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 770L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,710L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | 213g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 3,750-5,000 rpm | 1,000-3,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5,700-6,600 rpm | 1,800-5,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 17.8 s |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 435 hp 324 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 has 5 hp more than Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 and Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 2,544 kg 5,609 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 265 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 4.8 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5.2 s |
Although Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 has more power, Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 and Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 and Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 1,076 km 669 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 798 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 435 hp 324 kW | 4.8 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.2 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 435 hp 324 kW | 440 hp 328 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,544 kg 5,609 lb | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,076 km 669 mi | 798 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | 213 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 | Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8
- Has 350 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 278 km (173 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 524 kg lighter
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 555 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























