BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T · Stage 3vsBAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T · Stage 2vsBAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T · Stage 1vsBAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBAIC X75 · Facelift 2023
1.5T (Stage 2)
BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023
1.5T (Stage 1)
BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023
1.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful266 hp198 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best estimated range732 km455 mi
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 266hp198kW+89 hp | 230hp172kW+53 hp | 209hp156kW+32 hp | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft+165 Nm | 405Nm299lb-ft+105 Nm | 366Nm270lb-ft+66 Nm | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.3s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph-16.4 s Calculated | 79.6s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph-12.2 s Calculated | 81.6s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph-10.1 s Calculated | 91.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s-1.9 s | 7.3s-1.3 s | 7.8s-0.8 s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.5s-27.3 s Calculated | 36.2s-19.5 s Calculated | 45.2s-10.5 s Calculated | 55.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s-1.8 s Calculated | 6.9s-1.2 s Calculated | 7.3s-0.8 s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s-1.5 s Calculated | 15.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 732km455mi Calculated | 732km455mi Calculated | 732km455mi Calculated | 732km455mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,745mm187in | 4,745mm187in | 4,745mm187in |
| Width | 1,892mm74in | 1,892mm74in | 1,892mm74in | 1,892mm74in |
| Height | 1,715mm68in | 1,715mm68in | 1,715mm68in | 1,715mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,602mm63in | 1,602mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,616mm64in | 1,616mm64in | 1,616mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 200mm8in | 200mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 410L | 410L | 410L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,550L | 1,550L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 178g/km | 178g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp: Power / Torque
- BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 2) 230 hp: Power / Torque
- BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 1) 209 hp: Power / Torque
- BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T 177 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s | 7.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | 7.8 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.5 s | 36.2 s | 45.2 s | 55.7 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.3 s | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 266 hp 198 kW |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 230 hp 172 kW |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 209 hp 156 kW |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 177 hp 132 kW |
BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp has 89 hp more than BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T 177 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T 177 hp and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp: 89 hp (66 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 6.7 s |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 7.3 s |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 7.8 s |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T 177 hp: 1.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 2) 230 hp and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 1) 209 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 732 km 455 mi |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 732 km 455 mi |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 732 km 455 mi |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 732 km 455 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 266 hp 198 kW | 6.7 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.3 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 209 hp 156 kW | 7.8 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 3)266 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 2)230 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T (Stage 1)209 hp | BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T177 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 266 hp 198 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | 209 hp 156 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | 7.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 732 km 455 mi | 732 km 455 mi | 732 km 455 mi | 732 km 455 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp | BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 2) 230 hp | BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 1) 209 hp | BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T 177 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 3) 266 hp
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T (Stage 2) 230 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























