Car comparison

BAIC X55 1.5TvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BAIC X55

1.5T

185 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Most powerful
    186 hp
    139 kW
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    895 km
    556 mi
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

BAIC X55 1.5T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    305 Nm
    225 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBAICX551.5TMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
185hp138kW
186hp139kW
Torque
305Nm225lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
81.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
73.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
49.9s
Calculated
61.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.8mpg US39.3mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
738km459mi
Calculated
895km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,620mm182in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,886mm74in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,680mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,735mm108in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,615mm64in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
160mm6in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
350L
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BAIC X55 1.5TMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • BAIC X55 1.5T: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BAICX551.5T5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBAICX551.5TMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
49.9 s
61.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T
185 hp
138 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has 1 hp more than BAIC X55 1.5T.

The biggest power difference is between BAIC X55 1.5T and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T
305 Nm
225 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T7.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.3 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has more power, BAIC X55 1.5T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BAIC X55 1.5T and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and BAIC X55 1.5T: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX551.5T
738 km
459 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
895 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BAICX551.5T
185 hp
138 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.3 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BAICX551.5T
Power
185 hp
138 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,620 mm
181.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BAICX551.5T
Power
185 hp
138 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

BAIC X55 1.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BAICX551.5T
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BAICX551.5T
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBAICX551.5TMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
185 hp
138 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
305 Nm
225 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,620 mm
181.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
738 km
459 mi
895 km
556 mi
Trunk score
350 L
12.4 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBAIC X55 1.5TMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.8 mpg US39.3 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.57 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.22 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,077 L285 US gal237 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,885 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BAIC X55 1.5T

  • Has 65 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 157 km (97 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BAIC X55 1.5T
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5T
1.5T
VS
BAICX551.5TvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.5T
350h
VS
BAICX551.5TvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.5T
40 TFSI
VS
BAICX551.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.5T
1.3 T270
VS
BAICX551.5TvsAbarthPulse1.3 T270
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.5T
2.0 TSI
VS
BAICX551.5TvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
2.0 TSI
VS
BAICX551.5TvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1.5T
2.0 TDI
VS
BAICX551.5TvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
GLB 220d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
BAIC X55 1.5T vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster