Car comparison

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsBAIC X55 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

BAIC X55

1.5T

185 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,521 kg
    3,353 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

BAIC X55 1.5T

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.8 mpg US
    39.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    738 km
    459 mi
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentor2.0 TSIBAICX551.5T
Power
190hp142kW
185hp138kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
305Nm225lb-ft
Curb weight
1,521kg3,353lb
1,665kg3,671lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
1,970kg4,343lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
81.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
34.1s
Calculated
49.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.8mpg US39.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
688km427mi
Calculated
738km459mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,450mm175in
4,620mm182in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,886mm74in
Height
1,528mm60in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,735mm108in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,615mm64in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,625mm64in
Ground clearance-
160mm6in
Trunk volume
420L
350L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
53L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIBAIC X55 1.5TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • BAIC X55 1.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
BAICX551.5T5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentor2.0 TSIBAICX551.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.1 s
49.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
BAICX551.5T
185 hp
138 kW

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than BAIC X55 1.5T.

The biggest power difference is between BAIC X55 1.5T and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
BAICX551.5T
305 Nm
225 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
BAICX551.5T
1,665 kg
3,671 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
220 km/h
137 mph
BAICX551.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI7.1 s
BAICX551.5T7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and BAIC X55 1.5T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
BAICX551.5T
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BAIC X55 1.5T and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
BAICX551.5T
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
688 km
427 mi
BAICX551.5T
738 km
459 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph
BAICX551.5T
185 hp
138 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
BAICX551.5T
Power
185 hp
138 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,620 mm
181.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
BAICX551.5T
Power
185 hp
138 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
BAICX551.5T
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
BAICX551.5T
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentor2.0 TSIBAICX551.5T
Power
190 hp
142 kW
185 hp
138 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
305 Nm
225 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.8 mpg US
39.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,620 mm
181.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
688 km
427 mi
738 km
459 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor 2.0 TSIBAIC X55 1.5T
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.8 mpg US39.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km12.57 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi20.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,077 L285 US gal237 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,885 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 144 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

BAIC X55 1.5T

  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 51 km (31 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
BAIC X55 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
1.5T
1.5T
VS
BAICX551.5TvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
350h
VS
BAICX551.5TvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1.5T
40 TFSI
VS
BAICX551.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 TSI
GLA 220d
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
1.5T
1.3 T270
VS
BAICX551.5TvsAbarthPulse1.3 T270
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
1.5T
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
BAICX551.5TvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1.5T
2.0 TDI
VS
BAICX551.5TvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI vs BAIC X55 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster