Wiesmann Roadster MF4
Car comparison
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8vsAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J)
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful407 hp304 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score31/100
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions221 g/km
- Best estimated range632 km392 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 407hp304kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.2s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 61.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 632km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,190mm47in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,507mm99in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 285g/km | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-6,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 179 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 has 67 hp more than AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: 67 hp (50 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 4.6 s |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 632 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW | 4.6 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 407 hp 304 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 632 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 285 g/km | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
- Has 67 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 62 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 64 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























