Car comparison

AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSIvsBMW M4 (F82) 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S)

2.5 TFSI

400 hp2480 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

3.0

431 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2014-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Most powerful
    431 hp
    321 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    280 hp/t
    209 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    723 km
    449 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,440 kg
    3,175 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    192 g/km

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIBMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
400hp298kW
431hp321kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,440kg3,175lb
1,537kg3,389lb
Gross weight
1,840kg4,057lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
45.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
12.3s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
278hp/t207kW/t126hp/1000 lb
Calculated
280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton
Calculated
358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
655km407mi
Calculated
723km449mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,480cc151cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,191mm165in
4,671mm184in
Width
1,832mm72in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,344mm53in
1,383mm54in
Wheelbase
2,505mm99in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,564mm62in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,543mm61in
1,603mm63in
Ground clearance-
121mm5in
Trunk volume
305L
445L
Max trunk volume
712L
-
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
60L
CO2 emissions
192g/km
194g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSIBMW M4 (F82) 3.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI5,850-7,000 rpm1,700-5,850 rpm7,250 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)3.05,500-7,300 rpm1,850-5,500 rpm7,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIBMWM4 (F82)3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.3 s
14.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
196 km/h
122 mph
189 km/h
117 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
400 hp
298 kW
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 31 hp more than AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 31 hp (23 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
1,440 kg
3,175 lb
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
1,537 kg
3,389 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI3.7 s
BMWM4 (F82)3.04.1 s

Although BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has more power, AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
278 hp/t
207 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
655 km
407 mi
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
723 km
449 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
400 hp
298 kW
3.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
305 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,191 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,344 mm
52.9 in
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
3.7 s
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
278 hp/t
207 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIBMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
400 hp
298 kW
431 hp
321 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,440 kg
3,175 lb
1,537 kg
3,389 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
305 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,191 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,344 mm
52.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Range score
655 km
407 mi
723 km
449 mi
CO2 score
192 g/km
194 g/km
Trunk score
305 L
10.8 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
278 hp/t
207 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSIBMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI

  • Is 97 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Emits 2 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Has 31 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 140 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
2.5 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0
2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI plus
VS
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
2.5 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0
2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i
2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI vs BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster