AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 TvsVolvo C30 2.4 i 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.4 i 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions194 g/km
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V
- Best estimated range738 km459 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.2s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 95.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 43.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 738km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 2,435cc149cu in |
| Length | 4,041mm159in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,346mm53in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,422mm95in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 270L | 233L |
| Max trunk volume | 540L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | 200g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 5,700 rpm | 1,980-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 43.1 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T has 20 hp more than Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 7.4 s |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T and Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 679 km 422 mi |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 738 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | VolvoC302.4 i 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 738 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | 200 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T | Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 149 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 37 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























