Car comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 TvsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000

1.8 T

190 hp1781 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2005-2006
VS

Volkswagen Eos

2.0 16V TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    679 km
    422 mi
  • Largest trunk
    270 L
  • Best overall score
    50/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,665kg3,671lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
88.2s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
99.6s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
31.8s
Calculated
35.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
679km422mi
Calculated
671km417mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,781cc109cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,041mm159in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,764mm69in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,346mm53in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,422mm95in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,528mm60in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,513mm60in
1,553mm61in
Trunk volume
270L
205L
Max trunk volume
540L
380L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L
CO2 emissions
194g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 TVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSIPowerTorque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T5,700 rpm1,980-5,400 rpm5,950 rpm
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.8 s
35.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
190 hp
142 kW
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI has 10 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
234 km/h
145 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T7.4 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI7.8 s

Although Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI has more power, AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
679 km
422 mi
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
671 km
417 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
234 km/h
145 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
679 km
422 mi
671 km
417 mi
CO2 score
194 g/km
-
Trunk score
270 L
9.5 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 TVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T

  • Is 259 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 65 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
1.8 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
1.8 T
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T
2.0 16V TFSI
1.8 TBi
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsAlfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi
1.8 T
2.0 TDI ultra
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
1.8 T
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
1.8 T
40 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Coupe (8S)Facelift 201840 TFSI
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
1.8 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T vs Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster