Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8vsAUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI R8 Spyder (42)
GT 5.2 FSI V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.1 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions227 g/km
- Best estimated range701 km436 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score47/100
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight341 hp/t255 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 44.3s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 56.9s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.1s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.7s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 335hp/t250kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated | 341hp/t255kW/t155hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 419Nm/t280lb-ft/ton Calculated | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 701km436mi Calculated | 563km350mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,506mm177in | 4,434mm175in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,244mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,539mm61in | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 100L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | 332g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
- AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,500-6,750 rpm | 2,100-4,250 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,700 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.1 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.7 s | 10.8 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 222 km/h 138 mph | 207 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 317 km/h 197 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 3.1 s |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 341 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 701 km 436 mi |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 563 km 350 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.1 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.8 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 341 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8 | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.1 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 701 km 436 mi | 563 km 350 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | 332 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 341 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8 | AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 24.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 3,728 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo S 3.8
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 138 km (86 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 105 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























