Car comparison

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10vsJaguar XK Convertible (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI R8 Spyder (42)

GT 5.2 FSI V10

560 hp5204 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2011-2012
VS

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCabriolet / convertible2011-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.9 L/100 km
    12.4 mpg US
    14.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    574 km
    357 mi
  • Largest trunk
    200 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    41/100

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    317 km/h
    197 mph
  • Most powerful
    560 hp
    418 kW
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    341 hp/t
    255 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
560hp418kW
550hp410kW
Torque
540Nm398lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,800kg3,968lb
Gross weight
1,940kg4,277lb
2,185kg4,817lb
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
Unrestricted
310 km/h193 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.9s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph
Calculated
65.4s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
10.8s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
341hp/t255kW/t155hp/1000 lb
Calculated
306hp/t228kW/t139hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton
Calculated
378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
563km350mi
Calculated
574km357mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,204cc318cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,434mm175in
4,804mm189in
Width
1,904mm75in
-
Height
1,244mm49in
1,319mm52in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,752mm108in
Front track
1,638mm64in
-
Rear track
1,595mm63in
-
Ground clearance-
100mm4in
Trunk volume
100L
200L
Max trunk volume-
313L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
80L
71L
CO2 emissions
332g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V108,000 rpm6,500 rpm8,700 rpm
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.8 s
12.8 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
Unrestricted
310 km/h193 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
128 mph
195 km/h
121 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
560 hp
418 kW
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,800 kg
3,968 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
317 km/h
197 mph
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
310 km/h193 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V103.8 s
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V84.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
341 hp/t
255 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
306 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
563 km
350 mi
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
574 km
357 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
560 hp
418 kW
3.8 s
317 km/h
197 mph
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
310 km/h193 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,434 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,244 mm
49.0 in
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
310 km/h193 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,319 mm
51.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
310 km/h193 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
3.8 s
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
341 hp/t
255 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
306 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.4 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
Unrestricted
310 km/h193 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,434 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,244 mm
49.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,319 mm
51.9 in
Range score
563 km
350 mi
574 km
357 mi
CO2 score
332 g/km
-
Trunk score
100 L
3.5 cu ft
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
341 hp/t
255 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
306 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R-S 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT 5.2 FSI V10
GT 5.2 V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
GT 5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10 plus
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
R-S 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
GT 5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
R-S 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
GT 5.2 FSI V10
Turbo S 3.8
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10vsPorsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
GT 5.2 FSI V10
Turbo S 3.8
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10vsPorsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo S 3.8
R-S 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
GT 5.2 FSI V10
4.3 i V8 32V
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10vsFerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleR 5.0 V8
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 vs Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster