AUDI R8 Spyder (42)
Car comparison
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10vsFerrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F430 Spider
4.3 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Best power-to-weight354 hp/t264 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range605 km376 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best practicality score33/100
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10
- Fastest top speed317 km/h197 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions332 g/km
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.9s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated | 49.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 341hp/t255kW/t155hp/1000 lb Calculated | 354hp/t264kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 563km350mi Calculated | 605km376mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 4,308cc263cu in |
| Length | 4,434mm175in | 4,511mm178in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,244mm49in | 1,217mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,615mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 100L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 95L |
| CO2 emissions | 332g/km | 360g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,700 rpm |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 8,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 10.2 s |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 128 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 510 hp 380 kW |
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 has 50 hp more than Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 3.8 s |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 3.7 s |
Although AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 has more power, Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 and Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 341 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 563 km 350 mi |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 605 km 376 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.8 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.7 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | 341 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10 | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 563 km 350 mi | 605 km 376 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 332 g/km | 360 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 341 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10 | Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.85 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,728 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) GT 5.2 FSI V10
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























