AUDI R8 Coupe (42) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plusvsFerrari California T 3.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California T
3.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Highest torque755 Nm557 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions250 g/km
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Largest trunk241 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score45/100
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed317 km/h197 mph
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight345 hp/t257 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 755Nm557lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | - |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.4s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 11.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated | 345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 465Nm/t311lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 581km361mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 3,855cc235cu in |
| Length | 4,440mm175in | 4,570mm180in |
| Width | 1,929mm76in | 1,910mm75in |
| Height | 1,252mm49in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,631mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 100L | 241L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 340L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 299g/km | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 550 hp 410 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 has 10 hp more than AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus and Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 3.5 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 3.6 s |
Although Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 has more power, AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus and Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 581 km 361 mi |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.5 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.6 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 581 km 361 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 299 g/km | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | 241 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus | Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 215 Nm more
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 141 L more trunk volume
- Emits 49 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























