Car comparison

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDIvsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q8 (4M)

50 TDI

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv G

284 hp3283 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,027 km
    638 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Lightest
    1,949 kg
    4,297 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
286hp213kW
284hp212kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
2,160kg4,762lb
1,949kg4,297lb
Gross weight
2,890kg6,371lb
2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
85.7s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
26.5s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,027km638mi
Calculated
784km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,986mm196in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,995mm79in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,688mm66in
Wheelbase
2,995mm118in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,679mm66in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,691mm67in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
179mm7in
Trunk volume
605L
477L
Max trunk volume
1,755L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
58L
CO2 emissions-
171g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G5,000-6,000 rpm2,000-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.5 s
34.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI has 2 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
1,949 kg
4,297 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
241 km/h
150 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI6.1 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
1,027 km
638 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
784 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
6.1 s
241 km/h
150 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
6.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.1 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
286 hp
213 kW
284 hp
212 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
Range score
1,027 km
638 mi
784 km
487 mi
CO2 score
-
171 g/km
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 244 km (151 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 128 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Is 211 kg lighter
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

50 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
50 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
50 TDI
50 TDI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Standard Range 60 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh
50 TDI
50 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIvsAUDIQ650 TFSI V6
50 TDI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
EQE 350+ 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh
50 TDI
50 71 kWh
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIvsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
50 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 T4
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster