AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6vsMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-80
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest2,136 kg4,709 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,276 km793 mi
- Best economy score91/100
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,136kg4,709lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,781kg6,131lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 94.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.6s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 955km593mi Calculated | 1,276km793mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 3,283cc200cu in |
| Length | 4,992mm197in | 4,995mm197in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 170mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 258L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,971L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,750 rpm | 1,500-2,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.6 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW |
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 23 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 2,136 kg 4,709 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 7.1 s |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
Although Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 955 km 593 mi |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,276 km 793 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | 2,136 kg 4,709 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 955 km 593 mi | 1,276 km 793 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 | Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 347 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 24 kg lighter
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 321 km (199 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























