Car comparison

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 3vsAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 2vsAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 1vsAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
AUDI logo

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M)

2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)

378 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2019
VS
AUDI logo

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M)

2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)

328 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2019
VS
AUDI logo

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M)

2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)

297 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2019
VS
AUDI logo

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M)

2.0 TFSI

252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    262 km/h
    163 mph
  • Most powerful
    378 hp
    282 kW
  • Highest torque
    574 Nm
    423 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,910 kg
    4,211 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    198 hp/t
    148 kW/t
    5.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,027 km
    638 mi
  • Largest trunk
    890 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    72/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
Power
378hp282kW+126 hp
328hp244kW+76 hp
297hp222kW+45 hp
252hp188kW
Torque
574Nm423lb-ft+204 Nm
500Nm368lb-ft+130 Nm
451Nm333lb-ft+81 Nm
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,910kg4,211lb
1,910kg4,211lb
1,910kg4,211lb
1,910kg4,211lb
Gross weight
2,680kg5,908lb
2,680kg5,908lb
2,680kg5,908lb
2,680kg5,908lb
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
+29 km/h
251 km/h
156 mph
+18 km/h
244 km/h
152 mph
+11 km/h
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
70.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-17.2 s
Calculated
76.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-11.0 s
Calculated
80.8s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph-7.0 s
Calculated
87.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.4s-1.6 s
5.9s-1.0 s
6.2s-0.7 s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
18.7s-12.5 s
Calculated
22.3s-8.9 s
Calculated
25.1s-6.1 s
Calculated
31.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s-1.4 s
Calculated
5.6s-1.0 s
Calculated
5.9s-0.6 s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.5s-1.5 s
Calculated
14.0s-1.0 s
Calculated
14.3s-0.6 s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton
Calculated
262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,027km638mi
Calculated
1,027km638mi
Calculated
1,027km638mi
Calculated
1,027km638mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
5,052mm199in
5,052mm199in
5,052mm199in
5,052mm199in
Width
1,968mm77in
1,968mm77in
1,968mm77in
1,968mm77in
Height
1,741mm69in
1,741mm69in
1,741mm69in
1,741mm69in
Wheelbase
2,994mm118in
2,994mm118in
2,994mm118in
2,994mm118in
Front track
1,679mm66in
1,679mm66in
1,679mm66in
1,679mm66in
Rear track
1,691mm67in
1,691mm67in
1,691mm67in
1,691mm67in
Trunk volume
890L
890L
890L
890L
Max trunk volume
2,075L
2,075L
2,075L
2,075L
Doors
5
5
5
5
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
75L
75L
75L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hpAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 328 hpAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 297 hpAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI 252 hpPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hp: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 328 hp: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 297 hp: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI 252 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp5,000-6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp5,000-6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp5,000-6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp5,000-6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
5.6 s
5.9 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.4 s
5.9 s
6.2 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.7 s
22.3 s
25.1 s
31.2 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
251 km/h
156 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.1 s
6.2 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
9.1 s
9.3 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
11.8 s
12.1 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.5 s
14.0 s
14.3 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
107 mph
165 km/h
103 mph
160 km/h
100 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
378 hp
282 kW
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
328 hp
244 kW
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
297 hp
222 kW
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
252 hp
188 kW

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hp has 126 hp more than AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI 252 hp.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI 252 hp and AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hp: 126 hp (94 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
574 Nm
423 lb-ft
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
500 Nm
368 lb-ft
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
451 Nm
333 lb-ft
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
1,910 kg
4,211 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
262 km/h
163 mph
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
251 km/h
156 mph
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
244 km/h
152 mph
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp5.4 s
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp5.9 s
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp6.2 s
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hp and AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI 252 hp: 1.6 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 328 hp and AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 297 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
1,027 km
638 mi
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
1,027 km
638 mi
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
1,027 km
638 mi
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
1,027 km
638 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
378 hp
282 kW
5.4 s
262 km/h
163 mph
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
328 hp
244 kW
5.9 s
251 km/h
156 mph
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
297 hp
222 kW
6.2 s
244 km/h
152 mph
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
252 hp
188 kW
6.9 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
Power
378 hp
282 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
Power
328 hp
244 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
251 km/h
156 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
Power
297 hp
222 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
Power
378 hp
282 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
Power
328 hp
244 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
251 km/h
156 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
Power
297 hp
222 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.4 s
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.9 s
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.2 s
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hp
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hp
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)378 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)328 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)297 hpAUDIQ7 II (TYP 4M)2.0 TFSI252 hp
Power
378 hp
282 kW
328 hp
244 kW
297 hp
222 kW
252 hp
188 kW
Torque
574 Nm
423 lb-ft
500 Nm
368 lb-ft
451 Nm
333 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.4 s
5.9 s
6.2 s
6.9 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
251 km/h
156 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,741 mm
68.5 in
Range score
1,027 km
638 mi
1,027 km
638 mi
1,027 km
638 mi
1,027 km
638 mi
Trunk score
890 L
31.4 cu ft
890 L
31.4 cu ft
890 L
31.4 cu ft
890 L
31.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hpAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 328 hpAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 297 hpAUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI 252 hp
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,916 LC/year1,916 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 378 hp

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Has 74 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
R 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
70 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
8.3 V16
3.0 V6
VS
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.7 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12
AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 3 vs AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 2 vs AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 1 vs AUDI Q7 II (TYP 4M) 2.0 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster