AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont Pro
450TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,925 kg4,244 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk782 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range838 km521 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 268hp200kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,925kg4,244lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,715kg5,986lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 50.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28.2mpg US33.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | 838km521mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 5,158mm203in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,991mm78in |
| Height | 1,669mm66in | 1,788mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,817mm111in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,704mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,719mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 782L | 286L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,611L | 2,427L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 50.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI has 4 hp more than AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 7.6 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI has more power, AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 691 km 430 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 838 km 521 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 268 hp 200 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | 838 km 521 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 782 L 27.6 cu ft | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 14.61 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 23.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,253 L331 US gal276 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,192 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 496 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 147 km (91 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























