AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDIvsCupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight104 hp/t78 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,829 kg4,032 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,829kg4,032lb |
| Gross weight | 2,595kg5,721lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 985km612mi Calculated | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,621mm64in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI has 27 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
Although AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI has more power, Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI: 6.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 985 km 612 mi |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 985 km 612 mi | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI | Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 0.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 131.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Is 126 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,015 km (4,980 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























