Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,161 km721 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 181hp135kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,475kg5,456lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 87.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 42.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 1,161km721mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,447mm175in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 219mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,482L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 42.6 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI has 9 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 8.0 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 8.1 s |
Although AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI has more power, Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 679 km 422 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,161 km 721 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW | 8.0 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 181 hp 135 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 1,161 km 721 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Is 341 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 481 km (299 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























