Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

40 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    122 g/km
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,161 km
    721 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,475kg5,456lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
87.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
38.3s
Calculated
42.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,109km689mi
Calculated
1,161km721mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,663mm184in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,893mm75in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,819mm111in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,609mm63in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
-
Trunk volume
450L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
65L
CO2 emissions
122g/km
149g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.3 s
42.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
144 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
220 km/h
137 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.9 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,109 km
689 mi
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1,161 km
721 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
220 km/h
137 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
8.1 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.9 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,109 km
689 mi
1,161 km
721 mi
CO2 score
122 g/km
149 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.05 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.96 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used690 L182 US gal152 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,208 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Is 260 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 27 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
40 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
40 TDI
2.0 TDI clean diesel
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI clean diesel
Cooper SD 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Cooper SD 2.0
40 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
40 TDI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIvsAUDIQ240 TFSI
Cooper SD 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 vs AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster