AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-Pace
2.0 P200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range1,161 km721 mi
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,757 kg3,874 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,757kg3,874lb |
| Gross weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | - |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.6s Calculated | 47.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,161km721mi Calculated | 835km519mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,634mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 1,234L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,577L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.6 s | 47.1 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 10 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 8.1 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 s |
Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,161 km 721 mi |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 835 km 519 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,161 km 721 mi | 835 km 519 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 325 km (202 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 13 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 684 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























