AUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
AUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
3.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight215 hp/t160 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 65.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km473mi Calculated | 1,048km651mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,411mm174in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 356L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,261L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 5,300-6,700 rpm | 1,600-5,300 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI has 54 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 4.8 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 762 km 473 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,048 km 651 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.8 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 473 mi | 1,048 km 651 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 356 L 12.6 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
- Has 54 hp more
- Is 290 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 62 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Has 170 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
- Has 194 L more trunk volume
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























