AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6vsAUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight215 hp/t160 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range762 km473 mi
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score84/100
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s Calculated | 16.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,992mm197in | 4,411mm174in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 356L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,261L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 5,200-6,400 rpm | 1,370-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 5,300-6,700 rpm | 1,600-5,300 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 16.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 5.6 s |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 746 km 463 mi |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 762 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6 | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | 762 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 356 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6 | AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 55 TFSI V6
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 249 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
- Is 520 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























